9:40. Breakfast. Always.
Mistress notes a paperwork issue from our usually on the ball dentist’s office: she’d asked for an itemized receipt and they’d given her a regular one instead. She laments having to go over there to ask again.
“I could go,” I say. The words are out of my mouth before my mental filter lets other options into my conscious awareness. And the second they are, I’m wondering: why did I say that? I’m having a bad chronic pain day and I have plenty of things I want to get done. The words feel like self sabotaging people pleasing.
But that’s not how our dynamic works.
…
I don’t think autonomy in anticipatory service is a neglected topic, but I do think we frequently talk about only half the equation.
We assume that a focus on anticipatory service, rather than reactive service, grants more autonomy to the person providing that service: the ability to act before asked. And I think that’s true.
But what about the expectation that you’ll act before being asked? We’ll come back to that.
We also frequently assume that this is a zero sum game where the person receiving service has less autonomy: to decide what service they want, when, and how. But I don’t think that’s true. Anticipatory service, in my opinion, feels natural, comes with communication, and falls within the preferences of the person receiving it. Bringing someone a snack they don’t like when they’re not hungry isn’t anticipatory service: I’d argue that’s just bad service. Yes, mistakes and miscommunications happen, but that isn’t the goal. Often, when I hear people say they don’t like anticipatory service, every example they give me tells me that actually, they just don’t like bad anticipatory service. They’re tired of being served tea by someone who loves serving tea more than listening and realizing that the person they’re serving doesn’t drink tea. And that makes total sense.
I’d argue that the person receiving the service may have fewer opportunities to actively give orders, but they do gain the autonomy of framing their desires in a wider variety of ways. “I don’t want to stop by the dentist’s office…” “Wouldn’t it be nice if…?” “You may…” “I always ask someone else to do…” “Every day, at six o’clock…”
These probably don’t lead to action in a reactive service based dynamic where the service provider is waiting for an order; but they probably do when anticipatory service is the norm. This can be helpful for those who feel less comfortable issuing direct orders, won’t miss the opportunity to do so, or just want more verbal options. For some, a focus on the order format can feel like a painstaking game of Simon Says.
But others love the opportunity to give (or receive) snappy orders like they’re in an erotica novel, and focus on reactive service.
And realistically, there’s usually room for both styles within a dynamic.
It’s just a matter of communicating the balance you want.
…
Breakfast cleaned up, morning inspection done, I walk into the dentist’s office.
“Hi, Hannah!” chirps the receptionist. I will always maintain that Vegas is a small town in certain ways. “What’s up?”
I hand her the paperwork we got and ask for the itemized version. As she prints out the new one, she says, “You didn’t have to come all the way over here. I could’ve emailed it.”
“This is just…” the way it is “… faster.”
And to be fair, my required notifications to Mistress of my leaving the house and leaving the dentist’s office can’t be more than twenty minutes apart.
…
So what about reduced autonomy for the service provider when anticipatory service is the expectation?
I can only really speak to this from the lens of my own dynamic: 24/7, full time homemaker, irrevocable consent (no safewords, no limits, no way out).
That limitless upper end, plus our anticipatory service focus, means that there’s the expectation that I should and do offer anything I can. In dynamics like this, the expectation that you constantly give your all—give yourself over completely—means that it’s hard to go above and beyond. When anticipation is expected, there is no completed order to fall back on to say, I’m done. You lose the autonomy to sit and rest and wait for the next order before jumping in to serve. You are expected to be a bottomless well of timely, competent service with a can-do attitude.
Three days before running out to the dentist, after two hours of house cleaning, I spent another two hours sitting on the floor, deep cleaning one set of blinds—after Mistress reluctantly floated giving up on them after trying to help with them herself. Even without a direct order, I again was obliged.
Irrevocable consent might by why I can’t say no, but the internalization of a norm of anticipatory service is what demands my yes, and.
Still, this is all a matter of preference, and we both like our dynamic as it is.
And we know it quite well.
…
That night, after the standard 6 PM dinner, we go for a walk in the park. It’s a gorgeous evening and the playgrounds are swarming with kids, the sports stands are packed with fans, and dogs run in impromptu packs in the grass. This was one thing on today’s schedule, but the world doesn’t feel so busy right now, and my knee compression sleeves keep my body in check throughout the light movement.
As we walk, Mistress notes the blinds incident and asks, “Is that going in a blog post?”
“Maaaybe. I’m just not sure what the post is about yet.”
“‘I wanted to take a break, but Mistress made me clean the blinds instead. I hated it! But I loved hating it,’” Mistress predicts in an impersonation of me.
“No,” I say, laughing. “That’s been done, apparently. And I didn’t hate it. You didn’t make me,” I say, but then, I think, there’s something there.
“Uh huh,” she says, unconvinced both that there was nothing nudging my offer to continue with the blinds, and that she hasn’t correctly anticipated what I’ll make of it.
And maybe, I think: that’s what the post is about.
…
You can best stay up to date on all of my endeavors by subscribing to my free, monthly email newsletter here.
Keep up with me throughout the month on BlueSky!
